My Services

Custom Content for Your Blog

Blogging is an important tool for promoting a business. Unlike newer forms of social media, blogging draws potential customers to your website rather than a third-party platform. A blog also allows you to demonstrate your expertise and accomplishments within your industry.

But while many small businesses and law firms start blogs, they often end up gathering virtual dust after just a few months. It’s not that blogging is difficult, or that your business lacks potential content. It’s just that blogging requires time and effort you would rather devote to serving your existing customers.

This is where I can help. I’ve been blogging professionally since 2000–before the term “blog” entered the popular lexicon. I’ve served a number of professional clients, ranging from nonprofit public policy groups to college football websites. I know how to research and write timely content that will ensure your blog never goes stale.

How Blog Ghostwriting Works

Every business and blog setup is unique. I’ve had some clients who like to update their blogs 2 or 3 times per week, and others who only do so twice a month. The right blogging schedule depends on a number of factors, including the types of services you offer, how much news there is about your industry, and your budget for ghostwriting services.

Whatever your needs, contact me today so we can work together and develop a custom ghostwriting package for your business. As far as the final content is concerned, you will retain full ownership and copyright over all paid work-for-hire.

My Blog

More Posts

Divorce cases often involve emotional trauma, especially when there has been physical or mental abuse. Normally such issues can be addressed as part of a contested divorce proceeding. But can a spouse–or former spouse–bring a separate personal injury claim against the other partner? S.D. Court Overrides Its Own Ban on Interspousal IIED Lawsuits Many states recognize a distinct personal injury claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). This goes beyond the normal stresses of a failed marriage.


Anyone who has ever watched Law & Order knows that “you have the right to remain silent” when questioned by police. Furthermore, once a criminal suspect invokes his or her right to an attorney, police must immediately cease any further questioning outside the presence of counsel. These rights are protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution to ensure that no person “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.


Software runs many of our critical business systems. But what happens when the vendor responsible for the software decides to exit the market? Do customers have any legal recourse if they were led to believe product support would continue indefinitely? A state appeals court in Wisconsin recently addressed these questions, and found the customer’s options for relief were limited by its own decision not to purchase extended service contracts.


While intellectual property such as copyrights and trademarks have relatively well-defined boundaries, there are other intangible property concepts like “trade secrets” that are a bit murkier. Most U.S. states have laws to define and protect trade secrets. But it’s not always how broad those definitions are, or how far a business can go in asserting control over certain information. For example, a federal judge in Maryland recently held that static screenshots of a software’s user interface were not, taken on their own, a “trade secret” under state law.


Software development largely disregards national borders. Many open source projects have contributors in different countries, even different continents. But when legal disputes arise, borders suddenly matter again, since courts need to establish their jurisdiction over the parties involved. Recently, a federal judge in Michigan decided to exercise jurisdiction over a Dutch programmer accused of misappropriating a combination of open-source and proprietary code from a local software company. The judge also denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit.